Running Shoe Selector: Brooks or Hoka?
This tool analyzes your running habits and foot type to recommend whether Brooks or Hoka shoes would be better for you. Based on the article's comparison of stability, cushioning, and support features.
If you’ve ever stood in a running shoe store staring at rows of cushioned soles, you know the dilemma: Brooks or Hoka? Both brands dominate the market, both have loyal fans, and both promise comfort, support, and miles without pain. But they’re not the same. Choosing between them isn’t about which is ‘better’-it’s about what your feet actually need.
Brooks: The Precision Fit for Stability Seekers
Brooks has been making running shoes since 1914. That’s over a century of refining fit, support, and durability. If you’re someone who overpronates, runs long distances, or needs structure underfoot, Brooks is often the go-to. Their DNA Loft and BioMoGo DNA midsoles offer a balanced cushion that doesn’t feel like you’re walking on clouds-it feels like you’re being gently held.
The Brooks Adrenaline GTS is their most popular model for stability runners. It uses GuideRails technology to keep your knees aligned without locking your stride. Runners in Calgary’s winter conditions report these shoes hold up well on icy sidewalks and packed snow, thanks to their durable rubber outsole and snug heel counter. The upper is breathable but not too stretchy, so your foot stays secure even after 10 miles.
Brooks shoes tend to have a more traditional shape. They’re not wide by default, but they offer multiple width options-something Hoka doesn’t always provide. If you have high arches or narrow heels, Brooks gives you more room to fine-tune the fit.
Hoka: The Cushion Monster for Recovery and Comfort
Hoka One One came onto the scene in 2009 with a radical idea: more foam = less impact. Their shoes look bulky-almost comically so-but that oversized midsole is the secret sauce. Hoka’s meta-rocker geometry rolls you forward with every step, reducing the effort needed to push off. That’s why so many marathoners and ultrarunners swear by them.
The Hoka Clifton is their flagship neutral shoe. It weighs around 8.5 ounces, which is light for how much cushion it packs. Runners who’ve switched from traditional shoes often say their knees and hips feel better after long runs. In Edmonton’s cold winters, Hoka’s early models had issues with grip on ice, but the 2025 Clifton 9 added a new rubber compound that grips wet pavement and light snow far better.
Hoka’s uppers are stretchier than Brooks’, making them easier to slip on and off. If you have swollen feet after a long run-or you’re recovering from an injury-this matters. The tongue is integrated and doesn’t shift, so no more painful lace pressure on the top of your foot.
Key Differences: Fit, Feel, and Function
Here’s how they stack up side by side:
| Feature | Brooks | Hoka |
|---|---|---|
| Midsole Cushion | Firm, responsive, supportive | Extremely soft, bouncy, high stack |
| Weight (Men’s Size 9) | 9.5-10.5 oz | 8-9 oz |
| Arch Support | Strong, built-in stability | Moderate, neutral-focused |
| Fit | Precision, multiple widths | Stretchy, snug heel, roomy toe |
| Best For | Overpronators, long-distance training | Recovery runs, high-mileage, joint sensitivity |
| Outsole Grip | Excellent on wet roads | Improved since 2024, still decent |
Brooks feels like a trusted teammate-reliable, structured, and consistent. Hoka feels like a luxury spa treatment for your feet-soft, forgiving, and a little indulgent.
Who Should Choose Brooks?
You should pick Brooks if:
- You have flat feet or overpronate and need control
- You run 40+ miles a week and want durability
- You’ve had knee or hip pain and need alignment help
- You prefer a snug, locked-in feel over a pillowy one
- You’ve worn Brooks before and liked the way they fit
Many marathoners in Alberta use the Brooks Ghost or Adrenaline GTS for their long training runs. They’re not flashy, but they don’t break down. One runner in Lethbridge logged over 12,000 miles in three pairs of Brooks Adrenalines-each pair lasted about 500 miles.
Who Should Choose Hoka?
You should pick Hoka if:
- You’re recovering from plantar fasciitis, shin splints, or stress fractures
- You love the feeling of ‘floating’ on your runs
- You run on pavement and want to reduce joint impact
- You have wide feet or swollen feet from long runs
- You’re new to running and want maximum comfort from day one
Trail runners in Banff swear by the Hoka Speedgoat for technical terrain. The thick sole protects against sharp rocks, and the early meta-rocker helps with steep ascents. Even walkers with arthritis report less morning stiffness after switching to Hoka Cliftons.
What About Price and Longevity?
Both brands cost about the same-$130 to $160 for most models. Brooks shoes typically last 500-600 miles, depending on your weight and running surface. Hoka’s foam compresses faster, so you might get 400-500 miles before the cushion feels flat. That’s not a dealbreaker if you’re using them for recovery runs, but if you’re logging 70 miles a week, you’ll replace Hoka shoes more often.
Brooks also has a better warranty policy. If your shoes break down before 500 miles, they’ll replace them. Hoka’s warranty is more limited and often requires proof of purchase and photos of damage.
Real Runner Stories
A 52-year-old runner from Red Deer switched from Brooks to Hoka after a stress fracture. She said the Clifton 9 felt like running on pillows. Within two weeks, her pain vanished. She now uses Brooks for speedwork and Hoka for recovery days.
Another runner, a 28-year-old in Calgary, switched from Hoka to Brooks after her knees started aching. She loved the cushion but realized Hoka wasn’t correcting her inward roll. After three weeks in Brooks Adrenaline GTS, her knee pain dropped by 80%.
Neither brand is ‘better.’ They serve different needs.
What to Do Next
Don’t buy online blind. Go to a local running store-preferably one with a treadmill and gait analysis. Bring your old shoes. Let them watch how you run. Ask if they can compare Brooks and Hoka side by side on the same surface.
Try both on. Walk around. Jog in place. See which one makes your feet feel like they’re finally home.
If you’re unsure, start with the Brooks Ghost 16 (neutral) or Hoka Clifton 9 (neutral). They’re the most versatile models in each line. You can always switch later.
Running shoes aren’t fashion. They’re tools. And the best tool is the one that lets you run without pain-for years.
Are Brooks shoes better for flat feet?
Yes, Brooks is generally better for flat feet because of its built-in stability features. Models like the Adrenaline GTS and Launch use GuideRails and medial posts to control overpronation. Hoka shoes are mostly neutral and lack the structured support flat-footed runners often need.
Do Hoka shoes cause knee pain?
Hoka shoes don’t cause knee pain-but they can worsen it if you overpronate and need stability. Their soft cushioning absorbs impact well, but if your feet roll inward too much, the lack of support can strain your knees. If you have knee issues, try Brooks first, or use Hoka only for easy recovery runs.
Which brand lasts longer?
Brooks shoes typically last longer-500 to 600 miles-because their midsole foam is denser and more durable. Hoka’s ultra-soft foam compresses faster, so you’ll likely need to replace them after 400 to 500 miles, especially if you’re a heavier runner or run on hard surfaces.
Can I use Hoka for speed workouts?
Hoka’s Clifton and Bondi are too soft and heavy for speedwork. But Hoka does make racing shoes like the Rocket X 2 and Mach 5 that are designed for tempo runs and races. If you want to do speedwork, stick with Brooks’ Mach or Hoka’s racing models-not the daily trainers.
Are Brooks shoes good for walking?
Yes, Brooks shoes are excellent for walking. The Ghost and Adrenaline GTS provide solid support, good arch shape, and a smooth heel-to-toe transition. Many walkers with plantar fasciitis or arthritis prefer Brooks because they don’t feel too cushioned or unstable.
You might like
